Re: The original version
From: vldm10 <vldm10_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3773e495-cb2b-49b1-80f8-52d916caf868_at_y4g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3773e495-cb2b-49b1-80f8-52d916caf868_at_y4g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
On 6 srp, 22:58, vldm10 <vld..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> In this post I will concentrate on the following two:
>
> (a) A New Definition of ''historized attribute'':
> Definition 7 (Historized Attribute). A historized attribute BH is a
> string. A historized attribute BH has an anchor A for domain, a data
> type D for range, and a time type T as time range. An extension of a
> historized attribute BH is a relation over I x D x T.
It seems to me that the authors of "Anchor Modeling" in this definition do not understand some of the corresponding theoretical requirements.
Vladimir Odrljin Received on Wed Aug 31 2011 - 17:14:00 CEST