Re: SQL deferred constraints (a bit O/T, I know)

From: David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <34e099f8-da0d-4664-b87b-230f41b3ef31_at_22g2000prx.googlegroups.com>

On Apr 2, 11:21 pm, Erwin <e.sm..._at_myonline.be> wrote:

> This has been documented before. MVCC and database constraint
> checking do not fit together.

I thought in normal practice only read only transactions access old versions so MVCC doesn't upset constraint checking at all. Received on Mon Apr 04 2011 - 07:38:22 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David BL: "Re: relative complement?"
Previous message: David BL: "Re: SQL deferred constraints (a bit O/T, I know)"
Maybe in reply to: Roy Hann: "Re: SQL deferred constraints (a bit O/T, I know)"
In reply to Erwin: "Re: SQL deferred constraints (a bit O/T, I know)"
Next in thread: David BL: "Re: relative complement?"
Reply: Erwin: "Re: SQL deferred constraints (a bit O/T, I know)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message