Re: relative complement?
From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 08:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <512cd840-5849-4477-a48f-67d24736c7b5_at_s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 08:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <512cd840-5849-4477-a48f-67d24736c7b5_at_s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
On 2 apr, 17:49, Erwin <e.sm..._at_myonline.be> wrote:
> Procedural-or-not is completely orthogonal to supporting-MA-or-not.
That might be a bit of a howler, given that :
if "procedural" and "functional" are the only options possible, then
"not-procedural" implies "functional",
and "functional" implies that no variables exist that outlive the
lifetime of the functional program,
and the most important target for which the concept of MA has been
which is a variable that outlives the lifetime of any executing
program by definition.
Received on Sat Apr 02 2011 - 17:56:25 CEST