Re: RM VERY STRONG SUGGESTION 4: TRANSITION CONSTRAINTS
From: Reinier Post <rp_at_raampje.lan>
Date: 09 Sep 2010 22:10:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4c895b3e$0$14128$703f8584_at_textnews.kpn.nl>
Date: 09 Sep 2010 22:10:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4c895b3e$0$14128$703f8584_at_textnews.kpn.nl>
Brian wrote:
>As Codd has written, and as Bob Badour continually asserts every time
Not in my terminology.
>A surrogate for what? For an object in the microworld being modeled.
You're right that a mapping is intended, but it is
outside the database and not usually completely defined.
People or applications may turn out to have conflicting mappings
>the subject of surrogate keys comes up: Every key is a surrogate.
[...]
>If that doesn't constitute a mapping, then perhaps you can enlighten
>me as to what does.
-- ReinierReceived on Fri Sep 10 2010 - 00:10:06 CEST