Re: The original version
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:23:21 -0300
Message-ID: <4c3b79c4$0$11819$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:23:21 -0300
Message-ID: <4c3b79c4$0$11819$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
vldm10 wrote:
> In this post I would like to reflect on solutions for relationships,
> given in Anchor Modeling. In fact it is not clear what a relationship
> is.
>
> In Section 3 of the paper the authors write: “Furthermore, the
> relationships between the anchors are captured through ties”. But in
> section 2 there is Def2 which says: “Def2. An anchor A(C) is table
> with one column”.
> Now it turns out that the relationships between tables with one column
> are captured through ties? Of course this is nonsense.
So why bother mentioning it here? Received on Mon Jul 12 2010 - 22:23:21 CEST