Re: Many-to-many with both FK cascading deletes?

From: -CELKO- <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7752bfcc-9606-41c4-a574-a1f36c74fe14_at_k39g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

Some of these cycle problems are known to be ambigous or NP-complete. Add in deferred constraints and it is a real mess. The safety rule is to keep the cascades paths as trees -- no cycles. Received on Wed Jun 23 2010 - 16:38:05 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Erwin: "Re: Many-to-many with both FK cascading deletes?"
Previous message: Clifford Heath: "Re: Many-to-many with both FK cascading deletes?"
Maybe in reply to: Karsten Wutzke: "Many-to-many with both FK cascading deletes?"
Next in thread: Erwin: "Re: Many-to-many with both FK cascading deletes?"
Reply: Erwin: "Re: Many-to-many with both FK cascading deletes?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message