Re: Aggregates: Largest Groups

On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:24:19 -0700, Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net> wrote:

>On 01 Apr 2010 23:16:27 GMT, rp_at_raampje.lan (Reinier Post) wrote:

[snip]

>>Yes, that's why I asked.
>>The problem isn't described well enough to allow a good answer.
>
> That is why I started by asking him to define his terms.

     It should have added that I did not think that he knew what they meant in sufficient detail to come up with anything useful.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko Received on Sat Apr 03 2010 - 01:13:42 CEST