Re: compound propositions
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:07:32 -0300
Message-ID: <4ba2b1bf$0$12424$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> ...
>
>
> Alright I'll break what I said about no more comments today and my rule
> about not posting after I've opened the cheap plonk - another of your
> points seems to be that precision is required in order to recognize what
> still needs to be defined, eg., 'what is outside of the box' as you put
> it. But beyond some point or other (I suspect and hope you will
> elucidate just where one of those points is) I don't think pedagogy
> helps much in such a realm (as I suggested it those are mostly
> unfamiliar to me but they involve one of the few contexts to do with
> database that intrigue me).
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:07:32 -0300
Message-ID: <4ba2b1bf$0$12424$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
paul c wrote:
>> paul c wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> Which sections or portions refer to 'internal' for example? >> >> All the terms I mentioned are fundamental. If I recall correctly, they >> are all defined in 2382-01. Information and data are the first 2 >> definitions as I recall. >> ...
>
> Alright I'll break what I said about no more comments today and my rule
> about not posting after I've opened the cheap plonk - another of your
> points seems to be that precision is required in order to recognize what
> still needs to be defined, eg., 'what is outside of the box' as you put
> it. But beyond some point or other (I suspect and hope you will
> elucidate just where one of those points is) I don't think pedagogy
> helps much in such a realm (as I suggested it those are mostly
> unfamiliar to me but they involve one of the few contexts to do with
> database that intrigue me).
I am not sure what you are asking. I agree one cannot teach genius, if that's what you are getting at. Education is necessary not sufficient. Received on Fri Mar 19 2010 - 00:07:32 CET