Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
From: --CELKO-- <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c45fcdee-e8cd-4c40-9032-1a9032337079_at_o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c45fcdee-e8cd-4c40-9032-1a9032337079_at_o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
As I remember it from my ANSI X3H2 days, everyone else got "kicked out of the DB" when there was a session with serializable transaction isolation level. The intent was not to allow any other concurrent transactions. This was how you could do physical file maintaining tasks on the WHOLE database. But we aleays added "effectively" to the definitions. Received on Fri Jun 19 2009 - 01:02:55 CEST