Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?

From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <94549771-02a8-4089-beb7-95dadb3ec676_at_f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>


On Jun 9, 3:27 pm, Bernard Peek <b..._at_shrdlu.com> wrote:
> In message
> <61940522-4566-4b27-be4f-ad8afcbf8..._at_o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
> cim..._at_hotmail.com writes
>
>
>
>
>
> >Snipped
>
> >> The database community can handle this in a couple of ways:
>
> >> 1) Close in on yourself and mock people who do not have the
> >>    insights you have.
> >> 2) Recognize the problem and help sort out the misunderstandings
> >>    and snags.
>
> >> Over the past couple of days I have got a clear impression about
> >> what approach seems to be preferred by the regulars here.
> >Let me get this straight.  You need help from the database community
> >for a design exercice but you need that help to be done according to
> >the principles you believe are universal (whatever these may be).  All
> >I have seen so far are goodwill people who wanted to help you by
> >advising you to do some reading necessary to understand some basic
> >principles of database design.  In a word, you ask a question and
> >because you don't like the answer you now imply that the *regulars*
> >have closed themselves and mocked you.
>
> >Don't you think this is a hasty harsh judgment on your part ?
>
> I've been reading and posting to this newsgroup on and off for years. I
> think his analysis is pretty accurate.

Unfortunately it is.

  • Jan Hidders
Received on Tue Jun 09 2009 - 16:53:07 CEST

Original text of this message