Re: More on identifiers
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 09:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <df1703db-73c3-4a29-be6d-6c915659b015_at_y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 09:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <df1703db-73c3-4a29-be6d-6c915659b015_at_y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 7, 7:31 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> > On Jun 4, 9:52 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
> >>I have wondered for some time whether abstract identifiers are only
> >>needed within the confines of a flat relational model.
>
> > Merry Christmas:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/msg/a29e6e6cd225...
>
> > Marshall
>
> I am surprised you didn't throw in a GIYF.
Heh. I hadn't seen that abbreviated before. In the old days it was STFW. I guess that's from before G became so predominant.
Marshall Received on Sun Jun 07 2009 - 18:08:13 CEST