Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language
From: <vadimtro_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:37:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c62a6507-82af-420a-bf12-7aa0ce180f89_at_s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:37:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c62a6507-82af-420a-bf12-7aa0ce180f89_at_s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On Dec 12, 1:29 pm, vadim..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> Next,
Typo, again! The correct condition is
((x v y) v z) ^ R00 = z
The implication
>
> (x v y) v z = z
>
> that is z contains a subset of attributes common to x and y. With
> these assumptions the projection
z ^ R00 = z &
((x v y) v z) ^ R00 = z
-> (x + y) v z = (x v y) v z.
is still a theorem in RL. Received on Fri Dec 12 2008 - 22:37:17 CET