Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:05:05 GMT
Message-ID: <RWTYk.1450$yK5.1056_at_edtnps82>
>
> Why wouldn't it be more useful to respond to the OP? Are you trying to
> answer a question raised by the OP, in terms that make sense to the OP?
> Or are you trying to generalize the OP's question into one that is relevant
> across a largwer universe of messages?
>
>
>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:05:05 GMT
Message-ID: <RWTYk.1450$yK5.1056_at_edtnps82>
Walter Mitty wrote:
> "paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote in message
> news:FnSYk.1428$yK5.5_at_edtnps82...
>> rpost wrote: >> ... >>> To which he replied: but a forum message is often a reply, and in that >>> case, >>> a reply to a specific other message; this is not a presentation feature >>> but a basic structural property of his forum (and of USENET as well); >> For all we know, the OP's forum could be some idiosyncratic mutant, eg., >> one-user-at-a-time and synchronous. I'd say it would be more useful to >> consider USENET.
>
> Why wouldn't it be more useful to respond to the OP? Are you trying to
> answer a question raised by the OP, in terms that make sense to the OP?
> Or are you trying to generalize the OP's question into one that is relevant
> across a largwer universe of messages?
>
>
>
Looks like I was wrong about one thing, though. As far as the "larger universe" of this group is concerned, it seems the confusion of presentation with a model's underlying representation is more wide-spread than I thought. Received on Mon Dec 01 2008 - 17:05:05 CET