Re: Object oriented database
From: <patrick61z_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <d485d993-cad7-417b-921e-ea4d8b5facfd_at_a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <d485d993-cad7-417b-921e-ea4d8b5facfd_at_a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
On Nov 1, 4:04 pm, "Walter Mitty" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> <patrick..._at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:30cd4b21-5cb5-4e23-8229-c9f2960967c7_at_u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Nov 1, 10:12 am, "Walter Mitty" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> >> <patrick..._at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:ab77a4d8-c281-4417-af55-7f9b86af7fac_at_x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > No, in this thread its still the persistance. Sticking with dbms to
> > keep it familiar,
>
> Familiar to whom?
Someone mentioned dbms as what the discussion reminded them of or something along those lines. Received on Sun Nov 02 2008 - 16:34:25 CET