Re: Must we also create separate tables?

From: <Srubys_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12d41bd5-404a-4f6c-8a86-43f1413bdfce_at_t65g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>

Greetings

I apologize for not replying sooner, but for some reason my post didn�t appear for quite some time, so I assumed�

Anyways, if I understood your replies correctly, then not only is

STUDENT ( STUDENT#, STUDENT_NAME, SUBJECT, SUBJECT_NAME, TEACHER ) also in 1NF, but perhaps it is even more advisable ( at least until I get more experienced at it ) to do it this way and not to create separate tables for each group of related data when putting the table in 1NF ( since separate tables for repeating groups of data will still get created when I got through 2NF and 3NF )?

thank you Received on Wed Oct 29 2008 - 01:27:15 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Srubys_at_gmail.com: "Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..."
Previous message: JOG: "Re: Modeling question..."
Maybe in reply to: Srubys_at_gmail.com: "Must we also create separate tables?"
Next in thread: Srubys_at_gmail.com: "Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..."
Reply: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: Must we also create separate tables?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message