Re: index
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:31:07 -0300
Message-ID: <488de63f$0$4041$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:31:07 -0300
Message-ID: <488de63f$0$4041$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
aarklon_at_gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read the following in a book
>
> 1) we can have several non clustered indexes on a table , but we can
> have only one clustered index per table
>
> 2) index on the primary key can be clustered or non clustered
>
> now my question is
>
> 1) to what extent these statements are true ?
To the extent the statements accurately describe the physical implementation of a particular dbms, they are true.
Theoretically, one can have multiple clustered indexes at the cost of duplicating the data, which of course incurs a cost. Vendors typically assUme nobody would ever want to incur that cost. Received on Mon Jul 28 2008 - 17:31:07 CEST