Re: satisfies algorithm
From: David Portas <REMOVE_BEFORE_REPLYING_dportas_at_acm.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:57:32 +0100
Message-ID: <rqWdnZaR0I5yBxHVnZ2dnUVZ8gOdnZ2d_at_giganews.com>
> I'll rephrase the last part of my original response: There should already
> be a mechanism in the dbms to ensure that keys are unique. Usually, that
> is accomplished through the use of unique indexes. Happy?
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:57:32 +0100
Message-ID: <rqWdnZaR0I5yBxHVnZ2dnUVZ8gOdnZ2d_at_giganews.com>
"Brian Selzer" <brian_at_selzer-software.com> wrote in message news:Q40jk.17392$89.5634_at_nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> I'll rephrase the last part of my original response: There should already
> be a mechanism in the dbms to ensure that keys are unique. Usually, that
> is accomplished through the use of unique indexes. Happy?
Perfectly happy. Same point I was trying to make.
-- David PortasReceived on Sun Jul 27 2008 - 17:57:32 CEST