Re: Guessing?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:36:41 -0300
Message-ID: <483e08ad$0$4036$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:36:41 -0300
Message-ID: <483e08ad$0$4036$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> >>>Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>>>paul c wrote:
>
>>>>>The more I muse about it, the more I imagine that whatever the word for >>>>>non-anthro...phizing is, that should be the name of some as yet >>>>>undiscovered 'design Principle'. >>>> >>>>An antonym of anthropomorphize is objectify. I am not too fond of that >>>>either. >>> >>> Is there a safe word? >> >>What? Like prophylactic?> do?
>
> No. If I am not supposed to anthromphise or objectify, what do I
Embrace reality. People are people. Animals are animals. Rocks are rocks. DBMSes are systems. Received on Thu May 29 2008 - 03:36:41 CEST