Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:50:43 -0300
Message-ID: <47d70cc7$0$4076$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>Oh, you mean a constraint like:
>>
>>( ee# in excluded_ees{ee#} )
>>or ( not is_anniversary_period(pay_period(now),hire_date) )
>>or ( salary >= previous_salary * percent(1.02) )
>>
>>What's so hard about that?
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:50:43 -0300
Message-ID: <47d70cc7$0$4076$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
TroyK wrote:
> -snippage- >
>>Oh, you mean a constraint like:
>>
>>( ee# in excluded_ees{ee#} )
>>or ( not is_anniversary_period(pay_period(now),hire_date) )
>>or ( salary >= previous_salary * percent(1.02) )
>>
>>What's so hard about that?
> > Nothing - That's been my point :) Much easier to do this stuff using > relational (or, heck, even SQL) than by using "objects".
Oops, there was a typo mistake in it. I guess avoiding those is the hard part. Received on Tue Mar 11 2008 - 23:50:43 CET