Re: Object-relational impedence
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:57:26 +0100
Message-ID: <47d4e9ac$0$14352$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
> for a variable, but they can be different.
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:57:26 +0100
Message-ID: <47d4e9ac$0$14352$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> David Cressey wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> I disagree. It's clear enough for discussion purposes. A value stored in a >> variable lives in the scope of that variable, until it's copied (forwarded) >> to another place.> LIFETIME. It can be referred to in its SCOPE. These can be the same
>
> Well, no, it does not. A variable has its value during its
> for a variable, but they can be different.
The 'life' a variable hase outside it's scope is half-life at best. The variable does occupy resources, but in order to be useful in any way it has to be in scope. Received on Mon Mar 10 2008 - 08:57:26 CET