Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Robert Martin <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:40:18 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030600401818024-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
>>>
>>> Which is a bad idea.
>>>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:40:18 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030600401818024-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
On 2008-03-05 14:10:11 -0600, "Dmitry A. Kazakov"
<mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de> said:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:57:23 -0500, Thomas Gagne wrote:
>
>> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 01:10:01 -0600, Robert Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> <snip> >>>> You are confusing OO with static typing. In OO languages like Ruby, >>>> Python, or Smalltalk you can pass any object to any function >>>> irrespective of type.
>>>
>>> Which is a bad idea.
>>>
>> Why? > > Because it is in fact untyped.
No, it's just not statically typed.
-- Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com 800-338-6716 |Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 07:40:18 CET