Re: Object-relational impedence
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:19:50 +0000
Message-ID: <fqmv9a$hhp$1_at_aioe.org>
Marshall wrote:
> On Mar 5, 9:58 am, S Perryman <q..._at_q.com> wrote:
>>But you cannot claim that all OO prog langs will have an implementation
>>that forces the fallacious "one at a time" scheme
> Can you name one that doesn't? (I think I agree that
> one could exist in theory, however.)
CLOS, OCaml etc (by virtue of being built on Functional prog langs) .
>>(Functional programming being a case in point) .
> Why are you bringing up functional programming when
Because FP has :
> talking about OOPLs?
Are you talking about the map function (map : Type x Func -> Type) ?? If so, no (in fact, no for any likely meaning of "map" ) .
Regards,
Steven Perryman
Received on Wed Mar 05 2008 - 21:19:50 CET