Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Robert Martin <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:48:31 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030500483121153-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
> most
> I
> spewing
>
> I have to agree with this comment, based on my own experience.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:48:31 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030500483121153-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
On 2008-03-03 16:28:46 -0600, "David Cressey" <cressey73_at_verizon.net> said:
>
> "Roy Hann" <specially_at_processed.almost.meat> wrote in message
> news:nfWdnW05its1o1HanZ2dnUVZ8t2snZ2d_at_pipex.net...
>
>
>> Until I know their reasons for their views on data structures I couldn't >> say. However I notice that I am surrounded by programmers who consume
> most
>> the development budget writing code, and when a change request comes along
> I
>> can accommodate it in the database in minutes and they spend months
> spewing
>> out more code (sometimes after doing an extensive and expensive impact >> assessment). Code may not be evil, but it sure has a case to answer.
>
> I have to agree with this comment, based on my own experience.
OK, then I'll ask you the same question I asked Roy. If you *could have* done it in minutes, why didn't you?
-- Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com 800-338-6716 |Received on Wed Mar 05 2008 - 07:48:31 CET