Re: Mixing OO and DB
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:33:41 -0400
Message-ID: <47bda7e6$0$4056$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
>
>
> There is no "principle" . You appear to have been sucked in like the rest.
> Re: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/msg/a2f843524b98522b
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:33:41 -0400
Message-ID: <47bda7e6$0$4056$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>> S Perryman <q_at_q.com> wrote in news:fpjf5b$rul$1_at_aioe.org:
>
>>> What you are seeing is, after all this time, quite fundamental >>> misunderstandings of what Liskov/Wings' work is actually about.
>
>> The problem with the LSP so much beloved by the OOP crowd, apparently >> because the principle
>
> There is no "principle" . You appear to have been sucked in like the rest.
> Re: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/msg/a2f843524b98522b
Interesting. Now allegedly, there is no principle in the Liskov Substitution Principle. Is that like "there is no there there" ?
[remaining nonsense snipped] Received on Thu Feb 21 2008 - 17:33:41 CET