Re: Mixing OO and DB
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:50:38 +0100
Message-ID: <47b589c3$0$85796$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> I thought Marshall was joking. Anyway, don't take my word for it,
> Galois connections are mentioned in about every FCA paper.
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:50:38 +0100
Message-ID: <47b589c3$0$85796$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Tegiri Nenashi wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>> Marshall wrote: >>> Tegiri Nenashi wrote: >>>> The Galois duality between attributes and objects >>> Oh, shit. What does that mean? I have this intuition that >>> you've just said something that it's important that I learn about. >>> Marshall >>> PS. And I'm still meaning to follow up on the Galois connection >>> between syntax and semantics... need more Tarski. Mumble >>> mumble. Have to finish that axiomatic set theory book, then >>> need to read about model theory. Argh. >> Yes, V^H Nenashi, please elaborate for us mere mortals :-)
>
> I thought Marshall was joking. Anyway, don't take my word for it,
> Galois connections are mentioned in about every FCA paper.
He may have been. I wasn't. In the coming days I won't be posting much, I suspect :-) Thank you for these references:
> Here is FCA home page
> http://www.upriss.org.uk/fca/fca.html
> and introductory article
> http://www.upriss.org.uk/papers/arist.pdf
> There is even free software to play with, e.g ConceptExplorer!
Received on Fri Feb 15 2008 - 13:50:38 CET