Re: Mixing OO and DB

From: Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNenashi_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <0dc2c818-a96d-4928-af29-fa424216a697_at_s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>


On Feb 7, 2:04 pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail..._at_dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:00:15 -0800 (PST), Tegiri Nenashi wrote:
> > I suggest that OO ideas are too naive to continue influence
> > programming. Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is much more theoretically
> > sound method how to organize things into taxonomies.
>
> Sorry, but the idea of subsets used in place of subtypes far surpasses in
> naiveness anything one could charge "naive OO" with.

Are you referring to apparent object propelleheads unability to even coherently define what the object/type is? Then, the ability to operate a concept without defining it is certainly a sign of superiority of your method. Received on Thu Feb 07 2008 - 23:15:53 CET

Original text of this message