Re: Separate PK in Jxn Tbl?

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:34:39 GMT
Message-ID: <3o8mj.2872$ow.1081_at_pd7urf1no>


Tony Toews [MVP] wrote:
> JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>

>> I just think you're all damn brave for using Access in the first
>> place.

>
> Why? It works and works well. If you have too many users or remote users bolt on a
> SQL Server backend. Now you can have thousands of users.

All that cross-posting only encourages talk at cross-purposes. Every full-time Access developer I ever met had difficulty not mentioning the name and the word corruption in the same sentence. None of the customer apps had a problem with that since they were small enough to resort to paper when there was a problem. But when a file-based engine doesn't log, the important question is hardly one of too many users. It was okay for my family tree and personal tax accounts since by my definition since I preferred to think of those as fuzzy apps. Funny, once I started to say no to packaged goods like Windows, all my Access problems went away. I suppose it will be amusing to watch Google repeat the errors of history when they come up with "googleaccess" (I'm sure they will). Received on Thu Jan 24 2008 - 23:34:39 CET

Original text of this message