Re: Foreign keys

From: Brian Selzer <brian_at_selzer-software.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:51:43 -0500
Message-ID: <Aw5jj.4$nK5.0_at_nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>


"Kira Yamato" <kirakun_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message news:2008011510320716807-kirakun_at_earthlinknet...
> On 2008-01-15 04:37:23 -0500, "Brian Selzer" <brian_at_selzer-software.com>
> said:
>
>>
>> "Kira Yamato" <kirakun_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:2008011502240916807-kirakun_at_earthlinknet...
>>> On 2008-01-14 21:18:57 -0500, "Evan Keel" <evankeel_at_sbcglobal.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Always a physical issue. Never a theory issue.Agree?
>>>
>>> Foreign keys are functional dependencies across two relations.
>>>
>>> More specifically, let
>>> R1(K1, A1, B1)
>>> be a relation with attribute sets K1, A1 and B1 where K1 is R1's primary
>>> key and B1 is a foreign key to the relation
>>> R2(K2, A2)
>>> where K2 is R2's primary key and A2 is the set of its remaining
>>> attributes.
>>>
>>> Then the foreign key B1 represents the functional dependency
>>> B1 --> A2,
>>> which is the functional dependency across two relation I mentioned in
>>> the
>>> first sentence.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, through transitivity by the functional dependency K1 -->
>>> B1,
>>> the foreign key also represents the inter-relational functional
>>> dependency
>>> K1 --> A2.
>>>
>>> Am I correct to say this?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think so. A functional dependency A --> B is surjective, meaning
>> not only that for every A there must be one and only one B, but also that
>> for every B there must be at least one A. The relationship between B1
>> and
>> A2 above is injective, as is the relationship between K1 and A2.
>
> Hmm... According to Atzeni/De Antonellis's book "Relational Database
> Theory" (section 1.6) he does not include surjectivity as a requirement
> for functional dependency.
>
> --

Functional dependencies are defined in terms of sets of attributes within the same relation schema. A functional dependency is a statement, A --> B, where A and B are sets of attributes. A relation satisfies the functional depencency if and only if whenever two tuples agree on values for A they also agree on values for B. Since both A and B appear in the same relation schema, whenever there is a value for B, there must also be a value for A. So it does not matter whether it is a stated requirement, surjectivity is a property that functional dependencies exhibit.

>
> -kira
>
Received on Tue Jan 15 2008 - 17:51:43 CET

Original text of this message