Re: atomic
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:29:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4m1Xi.172718$th2.5724_at_pd7urf3no>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:29:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4m1Xi.172718$th2.5724_at_pd7urf3no>
paul c wrote:
.. But the predicates of the
> implicit relations are existentially qualified, ...
instead of qualified, meant to say quantified. (I suppose it is attributes that express qualification.) Received on Sat Nov 03 2007 - 17:29:52 CET