Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:23:23 GMT
Message-ID: <LySVi.162410$1y4.72749_at_pd7urf2no>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:23:23 GMT
Message-ID: <LySVi.162410$1y4.72749_at_pd7urf2no>
David BL wrote:
...
> Yes RM references things uniquely with values, but pointers are "value
> types"! ...
Sure, but what good does it do to think of them that way, when plain old "values" suffices? Received on Wed Oct 31 2007 - 04:23:23 CET