Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:04:58 GMT
Message-ID: <_wQVi.162434$th2.154966_at_pd7urf3no>
>
> You've hinted at this idea before. I make no claims about
> being a heavy thinker, but I've generally found your ideas
> to be worth pursuing. Do you have any suggestions for
> what I should be reading, before I start doing any
> thinking? :-)
> ...
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:04:58 GMT
Message-ID: <_wQVi.162434$th2.154966_at_pd7urf3no>
Marshall wrote:
> On Oct 30, 10:39 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> I would like to see more heavy thinkers thinking about 6NF.
>
> You've hinted at this idea before. I make no claims about
> being a heavy thinker, but I've generally found your ideas
> to be worth pursuing. Do you have any suggestions for
> what I should be reading, before I start doing any
> thinking? :-)
> ...