Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:06:07 -0000
Message-ID: <1188227167.564227.40500_at_i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
> Your sympathy (and Marshall's) is appreciated, but let me stress that
> I still believe that Kumar is making a genuine effort to understand,
> otherwise I would have stopped replying altogether. He does seem a bit
> overly argumentative, but that is a sin I am not completely free of
> myself, so I tend to forgive that easily.
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:06:07 -0000
Message-ID: <1188227167.564227.40500_at_i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Aug 27, 2:36 am, Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your sympathy (and Marshall's) is appreciated, but let me stress that
> I still believe that Kumar is making a genuine effort to understand,
> otherwise I would have stopped replying altogether. He does seem a bit
> overly argumentative, but that is a sin I am not completely free of
> myself, so I tend to forgive that easily.
No worries. VJ's cool.
Marshall Received on Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:06:07 CEST