Re: attribute name conflicts

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:54:02 -0300
Message-ID: <46ba2d31$0$4059$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>


paul c wrote:

> Doug_McMahon_at_yahoo.com wrote:
> ... I suspect it is these
>

>> use cases that led Codd to distinguish attribute names, which
>> are effectively member names with meaning only within the
>> scope of a relation.  ...

>
> The example I remember him giving was parts explosions.
>
> p

I always did like a good exploding BOM. Received on Wed Aug 08 2007 - 22:54:02 CEST

Original text of this message