Re: Avoiding bidimensional computing relation representation

On 6 mar, 00:58, "Tony D" <tonyisyour..._at_netscape.net> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 12:49 pm, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> [ snippage ]
>
> This post is just a "bump" to get this back to the top of the Google
> listings and see if we can get some discussion going on alternative
> ways to represent a relation to work on/with it...
>
> - Tony

Thanks for the intent. On masterdam's advice, I will try to rephrase otherwise the intent to make it more explicit to attempt trigger exploratory constructive thinking. Received on Tue Mar 06 2007 - 21:57:00 CET