Re: Objects and Relations
Date: 26 Feb 2007 12:30:50 -0800
Message-ID: <1172521850.455851.74130_at_m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
On Feb 23, 6:46 am, "Alfredo Novoa" <alfred..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 feb, 09:57, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > RM theory uses *relation* in its primal mathematical sense not in a
> > general common sense.
>
> The mathematical definition is just a formalization of the "general
> common sense".
Can you please explain what is in your opinion the common sense of a relation (or sense or esential of the mathematical definition). Or you can writte the mathematical definition so that we can see what we talk about.
>
> > To RM advocates, a relation is not a
> > *relationship* synonym
>
> Relation and relationship are synonyms.
Is the relationship related to the entities? This is one reason more, that we have here the mathematical definition of the relation, and short explanation of its sense.
Vladimir Odrljin
>
> Regards
Received on Mon Feb 26 2007 - 21:30:50 CET