Re: Objects and Relations
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 23 Feb 2007 04:34:38 -0800
Message-ID: <1172234078.091483.180900_at_j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
Date: 23 Feb 2007 04:34:38 -0800
Message-ID: <1172234078.091483.180900_at_j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
On Feb 23, 12:46 pm, "Alfredo Novoa" <alfred..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 feb, 09:57, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > RM theory uses *relation* in its primal mathematical sense not in a
> > general common sense.
>
> The mathematical definition is just a formalization of the "general
> common sense".
By common sense, I meant the one involving interpersonal
relationship. I am sorry of any confusion I may have induced. But,
how exactly do you formalize common sense?
> > To RM advocates, a relation is not a
> > *relationship* synonym
>
> Relation and relationship are synonyms.
Etymology issue. how do you equate a interpersonal concept with a
mathematical tool?
> Regards
Received on Fri Feb 23 2007 - 13:34:38 CET