Re: OT (sets and stuff)

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 19 Feb 2007 00:25:13 -0800
Message-ID: <1171873513.541857.271830_at_p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>


On 6 fév, 17:56, "Neo" <neo55..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Can Mamma Keith explain without a whipping?
>
> > Please do not underestimate Keith.
> > Seriously inviting him to a challenge will do a better job
> > getting him to contribute than this thin tease.
>
> How would you address a person who writes: "It's [Neo's] own fault. It
> is simply unwilling to learn the basics on its own. It demands spoon
> feeding. And even then it spits up quite often." And why would you
> expect Keith to respond to a serious challenge when he doesn't respond
> to simple questions? And why would one need to resort to a serious
> challenge to ask simple questions? How can one estimate Keith, if he
> doesn't answer questions or explain his logic, but instead offers
> insults?

When Neo does not do dbd. Neo can show some insight. Received on Mon Feb 19 2007 - 09:25:13 CET

Original text of this message