Re: Objects and Relations
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:45:31 GMT
> On Jan 31, 9:03 pm, "Neo" <neo55..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Here is another interesting one that applies to your solution. Since >>there is supposedly only one empty set, can it contain/reference >>itself?
> Can a thing that contains nothing contain itself?
> PS. And WTF do you mean by "supposedly?" You think maybe
> there are three different empty sets? How many different numbers
> zero do you think there are?
Two according to Knuth.
And how do you tell them apart?
By their sign. (No, not capricorn.) One is positive and the other is negative. (It's a one's complement thing.) Received on Thu Feb 01 2007 - 14:45:31 CET