Re: The term "theory" as in "database theory"
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:00:02 -0800
Message-ID: <ue9tr2phduhbu5au75tc8psptsm4ijce7q_at_4ax.com>
Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
[snip]
>> If you want to exclude the "wild-assed guess" then you pretty much have
>> to exclude Occam's razor too, because that's all it is. Occam's razor
>> has never offered proof of anything, it's a socially acceptable way of
>> introducing an unsupportable hypothesis.
It is not meant to prove anything. Putting it simply, Occam's Razor is a reminder to keep it simple.
>If you say so. Should we toss out the remainder of the scientific method
>while we are at it? Or should we just file everything under solipsism?
^^ "we"? There is only me. That is what solipsism is all about.Why do I have to tell you about this? <BEG>
From My Sig Collection:
"The fundamental problem with Solipsism is it makes me responsible for the fact that you're a complete idiot."
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Tue Jan 30 2007 - 03:00:02 CET