| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: 1NF (Marshall)
Marshall wrote:
> ...
> It does seem to me, though, that despite any relaxing of 1NF,
> we can get ourselves in to trouble with too much nesting.
> However the reverse isn't true; there is no trouble associated
> with unnesting. At worst you are talking inconvenience.
> ...
I have a problem with unnesting of some relations. If I have relation that has the unique combinations of parts ever shipped to any customer, eg.,
S{{P#}} = {
{p1,p2},
{p1,p3}
}
and I unnest it I get
SU{P#} = {
p1,
p2,
p3
}.
I would say SU doesn't mean the same thing as S. Maybe this isn't a problem to anybody else, but it troubles me if you are saying that the meaning can be preserved by unnesting alone, eg., without the introduction of other attribures than P#.
p Received on Sat Jan 20 2007 - 13:23:58 CST
![]() |
![]() |