Re: OTLT response

From: dawn <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com>
Date: 6 Jan 2007 08:07:15 -0800
Message-ID: <1168099635.902331.27090_at_s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


J M Davitt wrote:
> dawn wrote:
> > I finally took the time to get a response to David re OTLT (One True
> > Lookup Table) from October.
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_frm/thread/4ee44cdff90ca3e6/225932d7dca3af22?lnk=gst&q=otlt&rnum=2#225932d7dca3af22
> >
> > If interested, see http://www.tincat-group.com/mewsings/
> > --dawn
> >
>
> Wowsers.
>
> "Democratized data." "Metadata." "Tween data."

Mouse over to get descriptions. I didn't include one for Metadata, however, thinking that was a common-enough term. --dawn

>
> As the skimming continued, I found myself fruitlessly searching for
> descriptions of tween data and taint data.
>
> Disappointed? No, not when I came to the end and found, "...you simply
> need to decide whether to go with a single cohesive piece of tween data
> or whether you favor relational apartheid."
>
> Deep thought, that.
Received on Sat Jan 06 2007 - 17:07:15 CET

Original text of this message