Re: Curious SQL question

From: Brian Tkatch <Maxwell_Smart_at_ThePentagon.com>
Date: 4 Jan 2007 07:34:08 -0800
Message-ID: <1167924848.008026.120700_at_v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>


Bob Badour wrote:
> Brian Tkatch wrote:
>
> > Marshall wrote:
> >
> >>On Jan 3, 6:10 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Perhaps a more instructive question would be: How does one identify
> >>>those customers who bought no products at all?
> >>
> >>Heh. Assuming that the definition of "customer" is someone who
> >>has bought some products, the question of what customers have
> >>bought no products at all can be answered without actually
> >>consulting the database; it is a tautology.
> >
> > But we're talking databases here. Customers are defined by the Customer
> > TABLE, orders or not.
>
> Why are you so intent on proving your ignorance to the world?
>
> Customers, in a database, are defined however the schema defines them.
> In the original two-table schema given, no such Customer table existed,
> and yet the schema managed to define customers, which contradicts your
> absurd claim on its face.
>
>
> > Although, if they started a new field of Quantum Databases, you'd be
> > correct. :)
>
> If you have nothing useful, correct or even witty to contribute,
> perhaps, you would benefit from reading and thinking more than from
> posting. plonk

Killfiled. Thanx. :)

B.

>
>
> >>For the question to make sense, then, that can't be the definition
> >>of customer. Which brings us back to the question Bob asked.
Received on Thu Jan 04 2007 - 16:34:08 CET

Original text of this message