Re: argument about encapsulating data sublanguage
From: Aloha Kakuikanu <aloha.kakuikanu_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 28 Dec 2006 13:32:07 -0800
Message-ID: <1167341527.731783.154440_at_i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 28 Dec 2006 13:32:07 -0800
Message-ID: <1167341527.731783.154440_at_i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Thomas Gagne wrote:
> I admit to not getting the humor or the irony (I'll duck behind
> something now or "self thickSkin: #on").
>
> Many OO systems already have what Marshall describes above. To go a
> step further, Smalltalk doesn't even implement math natively. "x + y"
> sends a message to x telling it to run the '+' method with the argument
> 'y'. That's how Smalltalk can be taught o add apples and oranges