Re: Generalised approach to storing address details

From: dawn <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com>
Date: 13 Dec 2006 11:02:33 -0800
Message-ID: <1166036553.186515.196640_at_80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>


Marshall wrote:
> On Dec 13, 8:56 am, "Neo" <neo55..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > It has been proven in numerous research studies that menu's
> > > use is deletrious if nesting goes above two levels...
> > > Imprisoning users in Hierarchy and the simulation of paper in a more
> > > powerful media, are anchors round the neck of IT users that you would
> > > do well to not perpetuate.
> > > Very little in the world is hierarchical.
> > When using Google to read the multitude of posts within a thread (like
> > this one), do people find it imprisoning or liberating to use the
> > tree/hierarchal interface along the left side? Could it be improved by
> > limiting the depth to two levels or by presenting that information in a
> > tabular form?
>
> I frickin' *hate* the tree view in Google Groups. I kill that pane
> whenever I see
> it and just use pure thread view. Thread view rulez; tree view suxorz.
>
> Hierarchy suxorz also, for most things.

It is useful with children when they are young and occasionally bullet points in ppt. --dawn Received on Wed Dec 13 2006 - 20:02:33 CET

Original text of this message