Re: Proposal: 6NF

Keith H Duggar schreef:

> Val Carey wrote numerous times recently and in the past:
> > [stuffs words in other mouths] ... [bitches about what is
> > /really/ XYZ] ... [whines that XYZ is not the "original"
> > definition (much like a certain someone constantly whining
> > about the "original" definition of 1NF] ... [erects straw
> > men and chases red-herring to "support" broken arguments]
> > ... [sneaks in qualifiers not under consideration] ...
> > [falsely claims a reference supports his view (apparently
> > just regurgitating references from wikipeducation rather
> > than actually reading and comprehending the material]
> >
> > irrelevant ... bizarre ... mindless playing with formulas
> > ... irrelevant chaff ... any introductory text ... primary
> > school ... elementary school ... once you gradate to the
> > book discussion ... quite meaningless ... irrelevant
> > ... conjuring ... cheating ... absurd ... impostors
>
> And after all his dishonesty and condescending insults
>
> Jan Hidders wrote:
> > Keith H Duggar wrote:
> > > He said absolutely nothing of the kind, idiot.
> >
> > Please, Keith, there is no need for this.
>
> You choose to chastise me??

If it sounded like that, then my apologies. All I intended was a kind request to refrain from insulting language, however deserved it may be. The reason I'm making this request to you and not others is because I think you have the wisdom and strength of character to do so.

• Jan Hidders