Re: Proposal: 6NF

Keith H Duggar wrote:

> > > I do not recall learning anything in secondary school
> > > which would suggest 2 and 2.0 were numerically different
> > > in any way. Nor can I think of any *arithmetic* way to
> > > distinguish between 2 and 2.0.
> >
> > You have to construct all the real numbers and prove that
> > 2 is an element of the set.
>
> Any mathematical number construct that fails to equate 2.0
> and 2, fails to model our most basic common sense or
> "elemntary school" concept of the number 2.
Bulshit!!!

VC just answered the question that was asked from Marshall. He just stated the only way it should be demonstrated that 2.0 belongs to either the domain of reals. Such construct is perfectly valid and is totally independent from the ability to equate a value from the integer domain...In a word, your stupid ass does not even understand that domain of integers and reals intersect on values that equate them, but that each of their representation in each domain is different...

What a moron...Why don't you just shut up and listen to what people like VC may teach you...

> - Keith -- Fraud 6
Received on Sat Oct 21 2006 - 20:50:54 CEST