Re: Proposal: 6NF

Keith H Duggar wrote:

> REAL
> + : REAL REAL -> REAL
> / : REAL REAL -> REAL
> ...
>
> INT
> + : INT INT -> INT
> div : INT INT -> INT
> ...
>
> can be "combined" to give a two-sorted algebra for INT as
>
> INT
> + : INT INT -> INT
> div : INT INT -> INT
> \ : INT INT -> REAL
> Keith -- Fraud 6

Only an ignorant could arbitrarily state that division of REALS or INTEGERS with other REALS or INTEGER necessarily produces nothing but REALS or INTEGERS (respectively). Fraud number 6, as I named him, and he proudly assumes it, obviously ignores complex numbers or the fact that an output of a division operation may belong to several domain of values.

A simple Proof of the bulshit...

i is the imaginary unit such as
i^2 = -1

any complex number can be expressed as C = a + b * i -1 is a COMPLEX number if a = -1 and b = 0 -1 is also an INTEGER

4.23 --> REAL
-4.23 --> REAL
4.23/-4.23 = -1 = --> COMPLEX, INTEGER, REAL Therefore
REAL / REAL --> COMPLEX, REAL or INTEGER

same proof for INTEGERS

INTEGER/INTEGER --> belongs to COMPLEX, INTEGER OR REAL

An output value may obviously belong to one or more domain of values and can not arbitrarily be assigned to one domain except by an ignorant...

Because no proof can be brought up upon this false claim, other frauds are tempted to create bullshit operators such as *div* to *make it fit* and claim it to be algebra...

Comparable to people who state that NULLS are a value...

Be aware of pseudo scientists... Received on Sat Oct 14 2006 - 21:23:32 CEST