Re: Proposal: 6NF

dawn wrote:
[Snipped]
> I did not write my own definition. I'm working with the one that is in
> the cdt glossary that came from standard mathematics.
Standard mathematics..LOL
I have asked you to produce one example of algebric function and you are incapable of it.
Given the standard formulation of what you consider as a function definition, it is obvious to me you are confusing functions with sequences. And you still got the nerve of assuming such position...

> Cimode -- we can certainly write each other off, but I also think that
> we could put our definitions on the table and try to understand what
> the other means by their statements. What is your definition of a
> function and why do the functions that I presented not qualify as
> functions by your definitions? Is it because of a flawed definition
> you have of "function" or because you are talking about an SQL NULL,
> which I think I have repeatedly said is not the NULL value I am talking
> about? I would rather that we each understood the other before simply
> dropping it, if you are willing to put your cards (definitions) on the
> table.
You stick to a faulty definition of functions and ignore even basic definitions of what a function is even when people bring such definitions to you (I have provided a definition that is clear enough but you still got the nerve to state that is *my definition* ). I have no time wasting with self aggrandizing ignorants that have no intellectual honesty... Received on Mon Oct 09 2006 - 13:05:15 CEST