Re: Proposal: 6NF
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:41:40 GMT
Message-ID: <8dSTg.78337$R63.70243_at_pd7urf1no>
>
> What's your proposal for a systematic way of dealing with missing data?
>
>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:41:40 GMT
Message-ID: <8dSTg.78337$R63.70243_at_pd7urf1no>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Cimode" <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1159707552.227184.276470_at_k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> ..
>
> What's your proposal for a systematic way of dealing with missing data?
>
>
David, PMFJI, I really do think that an enterprise that is truly depending on missing data doesn't have a problem that is limited to its db, as it will soon go out of business. Actually, I don't really see how one can depend on missing data in general and no systematic solution is called for. Heh, also think that the IBM approach is best - namely It's Better Manually!
p Received on Sun Oct 01 2006 - 18:41:40 CEST