Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:50:25 GMT
Message-ID: <50YFg.2309$6s.2223_at_trndny08>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:50:25 GMT
Message-ID: <50YFg.2309$6s.2223_at_trndny08>
"Frank Hamersley" <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message news:FmXFg.14982$rP1.6132_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Perhaps a better term to have used would be "equivalence" as of course
> one would expect the logical and conceptual views to be aligned but not
> necessarily isomorphic.
>
Perhaps a better term would have been "conformant". Received on Sun Aug 20 2006 - 13:50:25 CEST